Replies

So then you are claiming a religion and religious process is aside from and indeed ABOVE the law? I am sure Osama and all his minions agree with you totally.

THINK MAN, about the positions you take and how they apply to ALL people.

The only problem with exempting religious organizations and aid groups from that whole "aiding" thing is that you in effect give them a free pass to attempt to smuggle people across the border and if they succeed then there's no penalty.

So the question now is, would you be in favor of limiting the type of aid they could give to illegals? In other words, if that part of the bill were changed to say that it wasn't criminal to give them holy communion or feed them etc. but it would be criminal to aid them in coming illegally or to knowingly transport illegals from place to place would you be o.k. with that?

And if not why? Why shouldn't churches or aid groups be forced to obey the same laws we have to obey?

I will say this, I am adamantly opposed to religous organizations and aid groups setting up water aid stations. I am not, however, opposed to them personally standing there and giving out water to illegals that they may come across who may need it. One is true humanitarian aid, the other is nothing more than enabling an invasion.

I would hazard to guess that the first time those giving aid were beaten, robbed or raped by those they were trying to help that they might have to reconsider their positions.