That isn't an attack clawrence. What I said is a simple truthful statement about your position as you stated it.
When I disagree with someone ( no bill is better than a bad bill) how exactly are they on my side? That makes no sense clawrence.
You do not like what I said to you and you call it an attack. Think now clawrence all I did was say what you yourself said and added in the context of today...that being the lack of adherence to the rule of law.
It isn't my words that you take offense to clawrence. Indeed it is your own position that you take offense to when you are shown the context of your very own position when applied to the reality of today.
In essence you are trying to blame me for your position.
I love it.
My "point" is that you are not "putting it in context of the reality of today" (if you don't like the word "attack") for those who ARE on your side but also point out that no bill is better than a bad bill. Get it now?