I wouldn't call em trolls so much as I would say they hold an ideology of being against something instead of being for it.
I offer that they would see much error in their own ways if they would be honest with themselves and everyone else by posting what it is they are really for rather than what they are against.
This would force them to back illegal invasion and argue only it's merits. Then they would have to weigh the good and the bad in their decision making process rather than argue an incomplete position that rests soley on feelings about part of the issue while they ignore other parts of the issue.
> wouldn't call em trolls so much as I would say they hold an ideology of being against something instead of being for it.
Fair enough, but this is the one issue that 90%+ of their posts are about, and I submit that they are Open Border all the way.
Were you to look back at Dane's history and listed evey post on the subject, it would take more time than actually sealing the border - which they both say is impossible, which is also the key to proving the rest of your post.
clarence3 could be his cousin LOL!