Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jeremiah

What in the hell are you talking about. You are so informed.


74 posted on 04/07/2006 12:32:10 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Logical me

Bush in responding to the question of the leaking of the identity of Valerie Plame, did not come out and say he knew who had "outed" her. He obviously knew, as he was the one that allegedly told others to begin leaking info in an attempt to deflect criticism from her husband and Dims. That is what I was talking about. He had that moment when he acted like he was gung-ho against leakers, when in reality it was he that was allegedly the source. No crime was committed, but it was a moment he will come to regret. Clinton broke no law by having sex with an intern named Monica, but he directly lied to the public, that was what drove his impeachment process. Without that moment, when he easily, and should have said either the truth, or just "none of your business", the investigations and impeachment would never have happened.


75 posted on 04/07/2006 1:27:25 PM PDT by jeremiah (How much did we get for that rope?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson