[MarkBsnr]

It will if population continues to follow projections. If population doesn't follow projections for whatever reason, it won't. It looks right now like it will, but the day is not over. What are you guys going on about? 10 billion? So what? The current population, even with the manmade famines in tinpot third world hellholes is eating at the highest level of calories ever. And projections of food production go much higher than population growth. Much of our food is wasted now, anyway. They said it at 3 billion, they said it at 4 billion, and so on. You might follow some different projections. Ones that make a little more sense.

[MarkBsnr]

Sorry about the HTML screwup.

It will if population continues to follow projections. If population doesn't follow projections for whatever reason, it won't. It looks right now like it will, but the day is not over.

What are you guys going on about? 10 billion? So what? The current population, even with the manmade famines in tinpot third world hellholes is eating at the highest level of calories ever. And projections of food production go much higher than population growth. Much of our food is wasted now, anyway. They said it at 3 billion, they said it at 4 billion, and so on. You might follow some different projections. Ones that make a little more sense.

[RightWhale]

Want to argue with a mathematical model? This isn't malthus, it's just simple population equations. Plug in current rates and rate of rate change and the number falls out. It's math, not famine, pestilence, disease, and war. Just math.