Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnAmericanMother
The artsy crowd looked down on "mere illustrators" - that being a person who earned his living by selling his paintings commercially instead of hanging them in galleries and waiting for museums or foundations or rich people to buy them.

Not to mention that the art world has fads and fashions like any other. Representational art was on the outs in the '40s and '50s -- all the cool kids were doing abstract expressionism. Rockwell's paintings tell a story, sometimes a very simple one, and often a warm and sentimantal one -- none of which were in favor at the time.

But as time has gone on, Rockwell, along with other storyteller-painters like Edward Hopper, and N.C. Wyeth, has come into greater favor among collectors and "serious" art scholars alike. Much like Dickens, dismissed in his own time as a writer of popular serials, is now taught as one of the greatest Victorian storytellers.

No matter how much time has gone by, Thomas Kincade will still be a hack.

48 posted on 12/01/2006 1:44:58 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: ReignOfError
No matter how much time has gone by, Thomas Kincade will still be a hack.

< backing slowing away, putting on crash helmet >

I absolutely agree. All that nasty commercial "country" kitsch is to Rockwell as Kincade is to the Hudson River School.

49 posted on 12/01/2006 1:52:12 PM PST by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson