To: RHINO369
But government shouldn't simply decree that companies must pay levels of minimum wage. That's socialistic and anti-Capitalistic. No business can last long if the DEMs keep foisting andincreasing wage bs and all the other machinations of capitalist and liberty destruction they love so much. I'm not saying $1 is fair, but at this point I'll take it.
It is better than workking for free.
52 posted on
04/07/2006 7:18:25 AM PDT by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: Killborn
I didn't say we should have minimum wage. However bringing in wave after wave of cheap labor from Mexico, and thereby breaking our laws and artificially bringing down wages because the government pays for what the illegals don't earn( if you make 5 dollars an hour and have 5 kids, you can't feed them on 5, so Uncle Sam picks up the slack). Its basically big business getting subsidized by the middle class.
53 posted on
04/07/2006 1:12:52 PM PDT by
RHINO369
To: Killborn
55 posted on
04/07/2006 1:20:14 PM PDT by
Windsong
(Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
To: Killborn
"But government shouldn't simply decree that companies must pay levels of minimum wage. That's socialistic and anti-Capitalistic. No business can last long if the DEMs keep foisting andincreasing wage bs and all the other machinations of capitalist and liberty destruction they love so much. I'm not saying $1 is fair, but at this point I'll take it. It is better than workking for free." If a business cannot survive without subsistence-wage labor subsidized by the taxpayer, then it wins the economic Darwin Award, and needs to go the way of the Dodo. This country does not need to import poverty,
56 posted on
04/07/2006 7:00:05 PM PDT by
CowboyJay
(Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson