Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: usurper
I am sorry, while this might seem like a good idea the logistics are overwhelming.

OK, say push came to shove. What about the logistics of a space based system already engaged, if they had not been already attacked and destroyed by anti-satellite weapons?

18 posted on 04/06/2006 11:21:51 AM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
OK, say push came to shove. What about the logistics of a space based system already engaged, if they had not been already attacked and destroyed by anti-satellite weapons?

I don’t know, but it seems to me that a laser space based system would have a better chance of defending itself from an incoming object than an aircraft system which requires a significant chain of support to keep it flying in the theater of operation.

The main problems I see with aircraft based platforms are where and when to deploy them. As most actors out there such as Iran would likely not launch from their own territory it would be easy to get around such a system.

26 posted on 04/06/2006 12:11:53 PM PDT by usurper (Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson