To: bill1952
I cannot stomach more of these.
That particular creature was not opposed by the Republicans in the Senate. All but 4 of them voted for her confirmation. And two other stinkers on the court (one recently retired) were Suiter and O'Connor who were both appointed by Republican Presidents.
And Bush almost put a La Raza supporter on the Court last year. He even nominated an unqualified political crony.
A Republican President is no guarantee at all of getting good Supreme Court nominees or of keeping out the bad ones. History has proven this.
903 posted on
04/06/2006 12:06:10 PM PDT by
Spiff
("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
To: Spiff
Bump.
909 posted on
04/06/2006 12:09:40 PM PDT by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
To: Spiff
"A Republican President is no guarantee at all of getting good Supreme Court nominees or of keeping out the bad ones. History has proven this."
You may be right. But a democRat is a virtual guarantee of stinkers.
To: Spiff
> History has proven this.
Hmmm... Let me tell you what history - and my vote - has proved to me.
Roberts. - Alito.
925 posted on
04/06/2006 12:14:41 PM PDT by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Spiff
A Republican President is no guarantee at all Still, we might get a good pick. Whereas a Dem is a certainty of a wackjob, globalist liberal. Bush and Congress should all be tossed out on their butts for this amnesty scheme.
945 posted on
04/06/2006 12:24:01 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
(Fellow 50th Congressional Freepers: Don't fall for Bilbray!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson