You are correct.
The poster did know his stance on illegal immigration. Attempting to claim they were "misled" is no different then Dems claiming they were "misled" over Iraq.
Folks voted for this President for valid reasons desite disagreements in other areas. Judges & WOT chief among them. Those reasons are still valid and I stand by my vote. I'm proud of that vote.
Attempting to construct a "misled" platform isn't going to gain traction with people that covet credibility.
However, it's beside the point. Past history. The question now is whether Congress deserves to be rewarded with re-election. While illegal immigration was A issue in 2004, imo, it should be made THE issue in 2006 by those that feel passionately about it. The calculation by Congress is that this can be swept away by November. Surprise them by keeping it front page.
Look, I knew that Bush was going to be awful on the issue of borders-simply by judging the record of his family, if nothing else, you could tell that-but even I am astounded by how little he cares about American citzenship, or how dense he seems to be on issues of genuine concern to a majority of the American public.
I had taken it as a given that amnesty had been buried with the 9/11 massacres, but evidently I was incorrect.