Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
Because Bush did well with Texas Hispanics, the fact that he got 44% of the total Hispanic vote is meaningless? That's like saying "Well, if Florida hadn't put in all those three pointers, UCLA would have won."

The texas hispanic vote is a huge component of the total hispanic vote. Presidental candidates (except Gore) tend to carry their own state by huge margins.

Without his home state hispanics pumping up the numbers, Bush was solidly beaten in the nationwide hispanic vote.

Not every politician is from Texas so they won't get that same home state advantage. Let's see how well a conservative republican from Ohio does with the hispanic vote.

1,435 posted on 04/06/2006 3:23:01 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1430 | View Replies ]


To: JeffAtlanta; sinkspur
Take Texas out of the equation, and all of the Cubans living in places like Florida and New Jersey, and Dubya didn't improve upon anything.

Out of all the rock-solid stupid arguments for eradicating our borders this one, i.e. that it will help the Republican Party's political fortunes, is perhaps the most incomprehensibly stupid, and that's saying something.

1,447 posted on 04/06/2006 3:31:56 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1435 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson