[XJarhead]

No amnesty! No rewards! This is not negotiable. Not to me.

If the choice is between 1)sealing the border, preventing future illegal immigration, and granting limited amnesty to those illegals already here, and 2) the status quo, which do you prefer?

[nicmarlo]

If the choice is between 1)sealing the border, preventing future illegal immigration, and granting limited amnesty to those illegals already here, and 2) the status quo, which do you prefer?

But the status quo is number 1 above, every time there's a new president, whether they have an R or D after their name.

[Spiff]

If the choice is between 1)sealing the border, preventing future illegal immigration, and granting limited amnesty to those illegals already here, and 2) the status quo, which do you prefer?

My first response is to say NEITHER! But, I must say that I would prefer to not pass any new laws than to pass any form of amnesty. You see, any promise or even hint of amnesty actually brings more illegals across the border in a mad rush. I'd rather Congress gridlock on this until next year than to enact any form of amnesty. We really don't need any new laws, we just need to actually enforce our existing laws. NO form of amnesty is acceptable, it will only make things worse. No Amnesty! No Rewards! Enforce our laws now!

[lfod1776]

I prefer the status quo.
Anmesty is permanent. Sealing the border is a promise that will not be kept.