The argument is that currently we are trying to usher them into the 21st century by way of Democracy and many think that to be a waste of time.
The counter argument is to kill them all.
I don't think it is anyone but the isolationist's and anti-globalist's, together with the pansy-asses, who advocate retreat and cover policy and nobody is taking them seriously anyway.
But I enjoyed the piece! It reflects the reality of a very sick religion that needs reform.
The historical solution is to militarily destroy the military capability of the principal Moslem entity, not defeat it, not re-educate it- destroy it. Right now that entity is probably Iran. Knowing that the educated Iranians areactually pro American or at least pro western does not change the necessity. Then Islamic states and groups must be deprived of resources. There oil producing areas should be colonized and the oil taken without recompense. Resources sufficient to wage Jihad must come from outside the Isloamic areas of the world because Moslem societies produce nothing beyond sufficient to keep a tiny elite in splendour and everyone else just above starvation. There is no incentive to produce because the Sultan or Emir or Kalif or Dey or Bey takes everything produced above that bare subsistence level. That characteristic of Moslem societies also produces hordes of young men for desperate and fanatic jihad. Death in jihad and the subsequent transportation to Paradise is really the only perceived opportunity to better one’s life.