Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Das Outsider
There is no reason to doubt that these documents are not authentic. They were found in the Iraqi military basis, Iraqi intelligence headquarters, Saddam palaces, and some other Saddam regime government buildings. There is no way that after the war, people came and planted these documents.
376 posted on 04/09/2006 10:37:53 AM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]


To: jveritas
There is no reason to doubt that these documents are not authentic. They were found in the Iraqi military basis, Iraqi intelligence headquarters, Saddam palaces, and some other Saddam regime government buildings. There is no way that after the war, people came and planted these documents.

I had to ask since FMSO does issue an authenticity disclaimer. I can't think of a conceivable way that the documents could have been forged following the 2003 invasion, and the prospect of pre-invasion decoys is unlikely. The forgers would have to be U.S. or coalition forces. Only in an "everyone lied about everything" frame of mind could that ever sound reasonable. Thanks.
377 posted on 04/09/2006 10:48:28 AM PDT by Das Outsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies ]

To: jveritas

P.S. I also had to ask because of the fact that Dan Darling of the Weekly Standard reported two days ago that the document had not yet been verified.


378 posted on 04/09/2006 10:57:36 AM PDT by Das Outsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson