To: Giant Conservative
Overall Statement: Medical Proof of Circumcision Benefits by Edgar J. Schoen, MD, FAAP
http://www.medicirc.org/summary.html
Compelling medical data much of it accumulated in the past 2 decades, have conclusively shown that a boy circumcised as a newborn has multiple lifetime health advantages compared to one with an intact foreskin.
11 posted on
04/05/2006 5:27:31 PM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
Even the posted article acknowledges there are benefits--it just tries to say they are insigificant. But risk lies in the eyes of the beholder. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank my parents for circumsizing me after I was born. Any simple procedure that can reduce the odds of my johnson falling off, even a little, is a significantly beneficial procedure to me.
In fact, the risks of various diseases in the link you provide are high enough that if the USEPA were in charge of this decision, they'd ban the foreskin quicker than they banned DDT.
To: FreedomCalls
Since 80% of U.S. men have been circumcised, I expect that 8 out of ten replies here will be for it.
376 posted on
04/06/2006 11:56:31 AM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson