Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cicero's_son

The extension could have just as easily used upgraded existing roads, but the government was only for new terrain from day one. They even wasted our tax dollars on a fake "study committee" to make an informed decision that was already made before the committee ever met.


24 posted on 04/05/2006 10:07:18 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: mysterio

I get it.

You're an engineer. A road-building expert.

You know a lot more than the umpteen expert panels that have studied this issue for the last 40 years.

And so we should just trust you when you say "use existing roads" despite all the evidence that the upgrade would cost more and yield poor results.


27 posted on 04/05/2006 10:09:31 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: mysterio

I get it.

You're an engineer. A road-building expert.

You know a lot more than the umpteen expert panels that have studied this issue for the last 40 years.

And so we should just trust you when you say "use existing roads" despite all the evidence that the upgrade would cost more and yield poor results.


28 posted on 04/05/2006 10:09:41 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson