Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indiana Is Open for Business
National Review Online ^ | 3/28/06 | Bret Swanson

Posted on 04/05/2006 9:02:13 AM PDT by cicero's_son

Indiana Is Open for Business Mitch “the Blade” Daniels is putting the state on the free-market cutting edge.

By Bret Swanson

There’s about to be a building boom in Indiana, which is desperate good news for a state that has been severely challenged by the global manufacturing shift and years of ambivalent leadership.

The chief architect of the boom is the state’s decisive Governor Mitch Daniels, President Bush’s former budget director. In Washington, Daniels drew scorn from congressional big spenders, acquiring the nickname “the blade” for his cost-cutting and privatizing ways. (The moniker could just as easily apply to his sharp wit and intellect.) The spenders in Washington, however, won those battles — big time — swallowing the blade and earning today’s enmity from the Republican base. But now Daniels is back home and in charge, and he is engineering a turnaround of an entire state with sophistication.

In the state’s short legislative session, just completed, Daniels achieved two sweeping victories. The first is the nation’s most aggressive telecommunications deregulation, which will spur hundreds of millions of dollars of investment in invisible infrastructure — the “fibers and frequencies” of the digital age, as Daniels describes it. The second is a $4 billion privatization lease of the Indiana Toll Road and the new I-69 interstate. This will fund the largest-ever upgrade of Indiana’s visible infrastructure: its antique roads and bridges.

Indiana is more dependent on manufacturing than any other state in the union. Low-cost Asian manufacturing and the troubles of Big Auto in nearby Detroit have drained employment in Indiana and depressed income growth. Daniels’ telecommunications reform was thus a major component of his strategy to connect Indiana to global markets, to diversify the state’s economy toward services, technology, and life sciences, and to make the state’s manufacturing base more productive.

Indiana’s telecom laws had not been updated since 1985, while the state’s Utility Regulatory Commission has administered some of the most severely anti-investment rules and price controls in the nation. But in a single leap, Indiana has moved from the back of the pack to number one in terms of the modernity of its telecom regime. By the end of this month, most of the state’s obsolete telecom rules will lapse. By 2009, the industry will be almost totally deregulated in the state.

An Indiana-wide video-franchise process was also adopted to replace the fragmented and wasteful cable TV franchising system that has 300 towns and counties telling global communications firms what to do. The new system opens up the investment valves by granting easy and quick approval to new providers of broadband communications services. With the reform, companies like Verizon and AT&T are now planning major new build-outs of the world’s most advanced fiber-optic links to homes and businesses in the state. Cable TV companies will be forced to respond in a beneficent upward spiral of new technology and consumer choice that could boost state economic output by more than half a percentage point annually for the next five years.

Ironically, Daniels’ “Major Moves” plan to lease the Indiana Toll Road, the seemingly more tame and obvious measure, turned out to be far more controversial. It passed by a single vote with just 15 minutes remaining in this year’s legislative session. Weeks before anyone had heard of Dubai Ports World, the bid by Australian-Spanish consortium Macquarie-Cintra to manage Indiana’s 157-mile stretch of I-80/90 had already ignited a xenophobic melee in the heartland. But unlike the DP World roll-out, Daniels had actually sought bidders for the Toll Road. His proposition was simple: The winning contractor will pay Indiana $4 billion for an asset that has never been profitable in government hands; the state gets to keep that asset; the contractor upgrades the asset with new technology and an additional $4 billion in improvements; and the state gets to fund a decade’s worth of other major infrastructure projects, some of which have been on the drawing board for twenty years. (Just last year Chicago leased its “Skyway” to Macquarie-Cintra for $1.8 billion. The Skyway connects Indiana’s Toll Road to Chicago, thus yielding a seamlessly managed road from Ohio to the Windy City.)

The day after this deal squeaked through the legislature, the Indianapolis Star concluded that “the protectionist, xenophobic rhetoric … used to fight the lease was an embarrassment to the entire state.” But Daniels won the day, sending a loud message to foreign investors that Indiana is indeed open for business.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: daniels; democrat; development; economic; indiana; infrastructure; mitch; mymanmitch; obstructionism; road; toll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: cicero's_son
Oh, btw, the route was selected even before Mitch came into office.

Yes, I did know that. But he was clear that he supported the decision to steal people's houses to build a new terrain highway to Mexico.
41 posted on 04/05/2006 12:45:20 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son
In other words the equivalent of a blank check to whatever Democrat is running.

The old "if you don't vote for our crappy candidate, you've voted democrat!" lie. You aren't going to blackmail people into voting that way any more. A vote for the libertarian is a vote for the libertarian. You don't own the libertarian vote. You just get it sometimes when you run a candidate who isn't a flaming statist.
42 posted on 04/05/2006 12:49:51 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

It's simple arithmetic.

If ample numbers of people do as you intend to do, then the Democrats WILL run Indiana again.

As I said, if your conscience doesn't bother you, fine. Personally, I think turning the state back over to the Dems over an issue as silly as DST is unconscionable.


43 posted on 04/05/2006 1:27:10 PM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son
Well, sometimes its the big things, sometimes its the little things.

I suggest you get on the horn to the state party leaders and let them know that they screwed the pooch.

If DST is as trivial and silly a thing as you say it is, then there should be no problem repealing it. Is it really that important to hang on to DST and lose the statehouse? What gets me about it is: we were already on year round DST! So why would Ditch Daniels mess with it when as 68skylark pointed out, had many more important issues to deal with?

44 posted on 04/05/2006 2:06:19 PM PDT by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son
I've plugged my nose to vote for Daniels-esque candidates far too often for one lifetime. If there's a candidate I agree with more, that's where my vote is going. That's how it's supposed to work, not this team mentality.

Daniels is strong on some of your core issues, so if you're happy with him, then I think it's a great idea for you to vote for him again. Believe me, I'm not trying to convince you not to.
45 posted on 04/05/2006 3:36:31 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson