Why do you bother to comment on an article that you obviously haven't read?
I read the article and I know what it is saying. I also recognized that the man in the article was not selected from a phone book. He was having a sexual relationship with the woman and had a child as a result of the relationship. A man who is incorrectly named as a parent on a birth certificate can request a paternity test. If he never met the woman, he will not be required to pay child support.