In a family, when they can't live at a certain standard of living, they tighten the belt, do without, etc.
That's all out the window post-divorce -- for the EX-WIFE.
SHE has a legal right to demand that HER standard of living be maintained, under guise of "child support."
The ex-father has NO right to ANY "standard of living". If he has to live in a box, so be it. The ONLY thing that matters is that he pay the "award" to the female progenitor of his former children.
Unbelievable, isn't it, that so many otherwise sensible people fall back on the ol' "If he didn't want to be responsible, he shouldn't have opened his zipper" routine. Notice they NEVER say, "If the mother didn't want to end up a single parent without enough income to raise the kid, she should have kept her legs shut." Meanwhile, our culture is SCREAMING in pain from the long-term consequences of fathers' roles being reduced via family law courts to emasculated tokens whose only role is to provide money -- suicided teen boys, promiscuous girls desperate for male affection any way they can get it, popular music filled with hatred toward women -- I can only shake my head in amazement. For "conservatives," an awful lot of folks around here indicate the same narrow-minded template thinking as Liberals.