Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Final Authority
because it keeps private insurers in the business of insuring private individuals, just as auto insurers are private.

Before requiring insurance for all drivers, Mass had 53 auto insurers in the state. Now there are only 18.

-snip-

-/snip-

Look for similar results from this new health insurance requirement.

79 posted on 04/05/2006 8:14:27 AM PDT by Between the Lines (Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Between the Lines
The problem with the Massachusetts system of insuring autos extends into the home insurance business, as you probably know. If a company isn't willing to write auto they can't write homeowners.

The only way companies can participate is if they are willing to be regulated.

We must learn here and give credit where credit is due. Mitt Romney is the first governor in many years to open up the auto insurance industry, and hence the homeowners insurance industry to competition so companies like GEICO can enter the market. It is not Mitt who is holding up the industry, it the super majority of Democrat legislators who are, and well paid at that, by the insurance lobbyists.
221 posted on 04/05/2006 11:22:31 AM PDT by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson