Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why The Clintons Belong in Prison
FrontPageMagazine ^ | April 5, 2006 | Jamie Glazov

Posted on 04/05/2006 2:46:07 AM PDT by ncountylee

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Melrose Larry Green, the author of the book Why The Clintons Belong in Prison. He is a frequent contributor to Newsmax.com and has been a regular guest on the Howard Stern Show. He is a graduate of Brandeis (B.A.) and Cornell (M.B. A.) universities. His website is www.melroselarry.com

FP: Melrose Larry Green, welcome to Frontpage Interview

Green: Thank you. I am taking a break from reading David Horowitz's book "The Professors" to chat with you. David is one of my heroes. Let's get into "Why the Clintons Belong in Prison."

FP: Ok, well it’s good to see you are reading the right books. So what made you write your book?

Green: I was on a trip to New York City about 8 years ago, when a friend handed me some articles about the death of Ron Brown. The author was a fellow named Christopher Ruddy, whom we all know from Newsmax.com. Well, one thing led to another, and I became obsessed with the many crimes committed by the Clintons. But the greatest crime of all is that they are not now behind bars. Mind you, I am a former Democrat, and I admit that I voted for Bill Clinton in 1992. I wrote the book because there is a myth that Bill Clinton was a great President, and I must set the record straight. Furthermore, Hillary Clinton is right now on a direct path to the White House, and I want to do my part to keep her out of the White House in 2008.

FP: Why did you vote for Clinton in 1992? Please explain the mindset as this is very mysterious and foreign territory for me.

Green: I voted for Clinton in 1992 because I didn't know any better.

(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: napscoordinator
Everyone needs to get rid of the fantacies about the Clinton's in jail. Not going to happen.

How about Cynthia McKinney? Isn't there at least one 'Rat we can nail?

41 posted on 04/05/2006 8:03:10 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bybybill; napscoordinator
You guys are being lulled into singing the Clintonistas' favorite song: "Let's move on!"

Hell, no! "No man [or woman] is above the law," as Theodore Roosevelt once said and as Melrose Larry is courageous enough to make clear.

Thankfully, there's no statute of limitations on the books for murder. Have you conveniently forgotten Vince Foster and the others?

42 posted on 04/05/2006 8:50:21 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
This is one of the reasons we are in trouble,the Clintons are toast, except to some of us.

I think of that scene in 'Fatal Attraction'. . .we really should assume nothing; albeit, I do not think Hillary will win. . .but there is always the issue of how the Clinton Inc. operates it's 'taking' enterprises. . .

The reality is, they should have been toast when they left Arkansas; but we only have to look at them today - post two terms in WH and now 'the Senator'. . .to see, what should be. . .is not.

The bigger question is why the Repubs allowed them their power and continue to. . .and of course, as noted above; the real crimes lie beneath. . .the 'blue dress' was never more than just that; in the Clinton schema.

43 posted on 04/05/2006 11:33:30 AM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Thankfully, there's no statute of limitations on the books for murder. Have you conveniently forgotten Vince Foster and the others?


I don't find the Clinton's being investigated much less even near trouble. I am a very realistic person. Maybe you should start an investigation if you are so concerned. I don't see one Republican or even more specifically a conservative even saying much of a negative word on the Clinton's much less starting an investigation on a guy that ended up dead ten years ago. I know there is a show called "Cold Case" but come on maybe in 100 years they may start an investigation. I don't mean to be glib, but I would be shocked if anything comes from any of these investigations. I mean during the entire Clinton Presidency, they only were able to come up with lying under oath. Does that sound like justice? Not really. I really hope you are right, but I would be shocked.


44 posted on 04/05/2006 12:25:06 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

How about Cynthia McKinney? Isn't there at least one 'Rat we can nail?



Maybe but I am not holding my breath. The one thing that is good is that the liberal shows are making fun of her so maybe the dems will get her. God knows the Republicans don't like going after dems for some reason.


45 posted on 04/05/2006 12:26:36 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
"But the greatest crime of all is that they are not now behind bars."

Short and sweet version here!

46 posted on 04/05/2006 12:34:14 PM PDT by patriot_wes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson