Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FourPeas
Depends on the circumstance. If you (and your parents) paid for your education than it's yours to do with or not do with as you please. Maybe you've gotten all you can or wanted from it after a 10, 15, 20 year career. If you met your obligations to pay and provide for yourself and any family no one has a right to say you're wasting your education. If you leaped from a higher degree program after getting grants and just stay home to take care of children, then there's a clear imbalance in having repaid your moral obligation to make good on those grants.

If government is going to take money from its citizens, it better give a meaningful ROI. Grants should be very carefully managed and if you don't offer ROI on education grants than you should have to pay back what you've taken on the premise that the taxpayers may get a great new teacher, or chemist or microbiologist for their investment not an overeducated liberal-cause loving soccer mommy.

31 posted on 04/04/2006 6:25:10 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Fellow 50th Congressional Freepers: Don't fall for Bilbray!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey
I believe there IS an ROI on the investment even if the woman stays at home. Period. As I said, I'm no fan of the gravy train. I personally watched many cases of abuse of the grant system while I was at college. I'm solidly against government grants, loans yes, grants no.
33 posted on 04/04/2006 6:29:55 PM PDT by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson