Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tennmountainman
So, are you saying that not introducing any bill and maintaining the same ( not doing enforcement )will benefit the GOP in the fall elections?

I'm saying that the Amnesty with the promise of enforcement in the near future (but please don't hold your breath) bill that is in the Senate right now is probably worse than doing nothing this year.

The first step is enforcement. Without that, in another 20 years we'll have to figure out what to do with 30 million more illegals which cross between this amnesty and then. If we can keep the current 12 million illegals pretty close to that number, then in a couple of years we can figure out how to allow them to become legal immigrants or temporary workers. If we legalize them first, the "problem will be solved" and border enforcment will be neglected again.

30 posted on 04/04/2006 2:54:55 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (If you have a leaking pipe, you shut off the water valve before deciding on amnesty for the puddles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

I could not agree with you more. However, the GOP will not be able to delay any stricker enforcement laws and expect a portion of the base to get excited about voting in the fall. They have been delaying long enough. And a bill that dies will be seen by many (like myself as the same old status quo).
Unless a heavy duty enforcement law is enacted, many conservatives will stay home. Why give control of all three brances of Gov, when they, as a majority cannot produce?


32 posted on 04/04/2006 3:02:16 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson