Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator
Perhaps. In our day and age we shouldn't have to guarantee humane care of the innocent. It should be a matter of right and wrong. The Right To Life is guaranteed independent of state power. I submit the vexing question is how to get across in our Culture Of Death, the point that neither the law or nor a judge at any time may withdraw or forbid, the provision of food and water from an innocent human being. We used to understand the meaning of a moral obligation. It is what separates men and civilization from animals and the barbarians.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

18 posted on 04/04/2006 12:18:58 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop
neither the law or nor a judge at any time may withdraw or forbid, the provision of food and water from an innocent human being

No judge did. The judge in this case simply affirmed the sole right of the guardian to make decisions as to treatment within standard medical practice.

19 posted on 04/04/2006 1:03:36 PM PDT by highball (Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson