Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

W doesn't have to agree with what the minutemen say anymore than he has to agree with what NOW says. The point I make is that he accepts their right to speak about it and to protest about it. Doing both in a legal way.

Minutemen are doing this in a legal way. W knows this and so do you. Care to post anything that says the minutemen are not doing do legally? Care to post where W has made any attempt to stop them?

If you really believe that W does not believe in free speech and the right to protest then by all means believe that. It's your right. But that honestly makes no sense given his actions throughout his presidency. I suppose he doesn't believe in free speech or protesting for the Iraqi people or the Afghan people either eh? C'mon Now!


80 posted on 04/04/2006 11:06:38 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: BlueStateDepression
No he doesn't.

What part of the vigilante remarks are you not comprehending?

The fact that he did not come and out and say point-blank, "I DESPISE THE MINUTEMEN," does not mean that he agrees-either tacitly or explicitly-with their primary goal, i.e. to exert some sort of control over our So. border.

Bush and Fox are of one mind on this subject.

There is no daylight between them.

Period, end of sentence.

81 posted on 04/04/2006 11:50:58 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson