Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forum Aims to Unleash Next Generation of Space Billionaires
space.com ^ | 04/03/06 | Leonard David

Posted on 04/03/2006 6:07:27 PM PDT by KevinDavis

Creating a money-making rationale for private space ventures—be they public space travel, orbiting hotels, low-cost rocketry, a space junk collection service, or even a lunar power and light company—such enterprises must be grounded in first-order business basics.

Over the decades, several entrepreneurial space firms have come and gone, their vision getting too far ahead of business reality, but there are encouraging signs that private space ventures are reinvigorating—as well as agitating and disrupting—customary models of space commercialization.

That’s the message to be heard at Space Billionaires: Educating the Next Generation of Entrepreneurs, a Thought Leader Forum being held April 4 at the Wilshire Grand Hotel in Los Angeles and organized by the University of Southern California’s (USC) Marshall Center for Technology Commercialization.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: entrepreneurs; privatespace; space; spacebillionaires; spacetourism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 04/03/2006 6:07:28 PM PDT by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...

2 posted on 04/03/2006 6:08:25 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis; RightWhale

"Thar's GOLD in them thar minor planetoids!"

and that, in a nutshell, is all it takes for motive: pure, unadulterated, utterly shameless greed.

what will it take to make that motive take hold of peoples' throats?

relative ease of access to extra-orbital space.

what will it take to make THAT happen?
a self-sufficient lunar colony with manufacturing facilities and a mass-driver launch system.

so... how do we get THERE from here?


3 posted on 04/03/2006 6:14:21 PM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal. this would not be a problem if so many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Withdraw from the Treaty and accept claims at the Land Office. Gov't won't be able to keep up with the private sector on this frontier and will have to budget an extra clerk at the BLM.


4 posted on 04/03/2006 6:15:43 PM PDT by RightWhale (Nothing can evolve which has not been involved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
what will it take to make THAT happen?

Dump the Treaty and register claims. That's all.

Nobody knows where to invest anymore and there is a lot of money sloshing around. So much just sitting at 5%, and all of it ready for investment in something other than molasses and tar.

5 posted on 04/03/2006 6:19:21 PM PDT by RightWhale (Nothing can evolve which has not been involved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

"Next Generation of Space Billionaires"




I guess I must have overlooked the previous generation of space billionaires, unless it's referring to Soros.


6 posted on 04/03/2006 6:21:58 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

so... what does it take to divest from a treaty?


7 posted on 04/03/2006 6:23:28 PM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal. this would not be a problem if so many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
what does it take to divest from a treaty?

It's about as easy as getting an islamic divorce. Serve notice and wait a year. Done.

8 posted on 04/03/2006 6:25:03 PM PDT by RightWhale (Nothing can evolve which has not been involved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

you JEST!?!


9 posted on 04/03/2006 6:28:46 PM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal. this would not be a problem if so many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

The escape clause is written in the body of the Treaty. The Pres has the authority all by himself if he wants to do it. Pre-approved in itself.


10 posted on 04/03/2006 6:31:19 PM PDT by RightWhale (Nothing can evolve which has not been involved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

no [beep]?
kewlie.

how do we nudge whoever needs tobe nudged to make use of the exit clause from that idiotic agreement?

also: where's the full text of that idiotic agreement?


11 posted on 04/03/2006 6:37:55 PM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal. this would not be a problem if so many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty (google)

My Senator is willing to dump the Treaty if we can get some interest going out here.

12 posted on 04/03/2006 6:41:35 PM PDT by RightWhale (Nothing can evolve which has not been involved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I'm interested in dumping that treaty.
If I had money and was interested in making it turn into BIG money, I'd be interested in exploiting space resources after that treaty was dumped.


13 posted on 04/03/2006 6:54:32 PM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal. this would not be a problem if so many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

tagline change


14 posted on 04/03/2006 6:56:01 PM PDT by King Prout (The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

I got a very nice letter from my Senator about the Treaty. Everybody, including the White House, knows the Treaty is doing no one any good and is stopping private investment. But, international inertia is a fearsome thing, as we see every day with Mexico, Iraq, Iran, China, and all our other friends.


15 posted on 04/03/2006 7:11:55 PM PDT by RightWhale (Nothing can evolve which has not been involved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
An old tagline returns. :)

Is this a movement?

16 posted on 04/03/2006 7:14:40 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Darksheare; scott0347; timpad; Conspiracy Guy; NYC GOP Chick; MeekOneGOP; Fedora; ...
tagline change

An old tagline returns. :)
Is this a movement?

hrmn...

over the last few years, I have somehow managed to get several hundred people to regularly consider seriously my musings and laugh at my jokes. I don't know how that happened, but perhaps...

My FRiends,
I cannot in good faith ask you to take a public stand blindly. Instead, I ask that you please visit this link and read the text of the United Nations 1967 Outer Space Treaty, of which the US is a signatory.

Please consider its anti-capitalist, anti-property, essentially Statist nature. Please consider how it has stymied and shall continue to stymie private profit-motivated use of space. Please note that it forms a legal block against American military supremacy in an era in which technical innovation and unexpected/uncounterable capabilities are all that keep America ascendant.

If you agree that this treaty is bad for America and, ultimately, bad for free humanity, please join us in condemning it publicly and advocating America's withdrawal from it.

A place to start: Archive your current tagline, and replace it for the remainder of April with condemnation of this treaty. If and when anyone asks you about your tagline, refer them here, to this thread, and suggest they do as you have done.

Any advocacy you choose to take In Real Life would be welcome.

Thank you for your consideration,
kp

17 posted on 04/03/2006 7:57:12 PM PDT by King Prout (The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

Done.


18 posted on 04/03/2006 8:03:52 PM PDT by bad company ((The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bad company

sweet!

I have hopes for what I shall witness when I awake tomorrow.


19 posted on 04/03/2006 8:06:14 PM PDT by King Prout (The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
You got it.

Note tagline change.

20 posted on 04/03/2006 8:10:00 PM PDT by Coyoteman (April's interim tagline: The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson