That is simplistic and not entirely accurate. This is commentary on "the traditional conservative agenda lies in ruins," which the author feels can be directly placed at the feet of President Bush.
"This is commentary on "the traditional conservative agenda lies in ruins," which the author feels can be directly placed at the feet of President Bush.
"
I disagree. The article is Bush-bashing, pure and simple. As I said in a later message, I'm not a big fan of many of Bush's policies. However, nothing good will come of this sort of crap. Unless you are a liberal, of course, in which case, splitting the right is a very good idea.
Is that the desired result? If it's not, then the anti-Bush rhetoric from the right needs to be toned down considerably and converted to supportive, but constructive criticism.
What I'm seeing is tons of sheer pique on the part of the most conservative portions of the GOP. That bodes ill for 2006 AND 2008.