Heh. Here is what I wrote yesterday long before you posted http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1608373/posts?page=11#11):
"I'll just get this out so that the GWB loyalists don't have to:
- Without GWB we would be in danger of terrorism (partially true - but not the basis of the criticism in this article...no one has said that he is failing as commander in chief; even FDR can win a war)
- The Democrats would be worse on spending (arguably false, as if the D's were in charge, the GOP would become an effective opposition party)
- if you oppose GWB, you are a RINO using DU and DNC talking points (whatever...that's one of the points of the article ie that the vilification of those who dare question the king is poor procedure and in this White House has led to profoundly liberal policies)
Now...if the Bush loyalists have better arguments than those to SUBSTANTIVELY deal with this article and not just bitch and moan at the author and those who agree with them, then there are a lot of us here who are all ears.
(While we're at it, I wonder if the accounting guru's who have us the numbers for the prescription drugs benefit factored in all of the amnesty for illegals who will now officially become part of the Republican welfare state? Anyone think of that? Anyone?)"
As you can see, your completely predictible post falls into the third category, ie, that those who are critical are just a bunch of lefties.
Yawn.
When you are ready to vigorously, respectfully and intelligently debate his record as a conservative and the status of the movement under his stewardship, then come back. Plenty of freepers are eager for that discussion. If you just want to resort to the same old, tired and predictible name calling, well, it's all been said before.
Many things are predictable here and elsewhere. That has nothing to do with their truth or falsity. I read your post before posting mind and paid no attention to it.
Those who cannot see the big picture and the absolute necessity to keep the RATS from ever regaining the levers of power are either: good hearted but easily confused and manipulated people, out right Leftists who dedicate their lives to Bush hatred, or Psuedo-Conservatives who are perpetually pissed off and have never supported the President OR any other candidate capable of getting over 2% of the vote.
Bush has implemented conservative ideals beginning with the most important: Fighting those who would destroy the Nation, cutting taxes, implementing a rational foreign policy and reigning in an out of control Judicial system.
Policies which the Perpetually Pissed Off whine about are secondary and only become important when the three MAJOR policies have failed. Efforts by the Treason Media to deflect the awareness of the nation into Bush Hatred are directed at the most conservative president we have ever had (including Reagan.) Why would anyone claiming to be conservative join the mindless mob of Bush haters?
In this case it is like a sports fan furious because his team is only winning by three touchdowns with 10 minutes left in the game when he thinks they should be up by five so he demands the coach be fired and eleven players be recruited from the stands to play in place of the first team. Such people are and always will be politically irrelevant.