Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ideas_over_party
"Gore would've apologized to them.

Kerry would've tried to be nuanced and follow the French lead."

I'm not so sure Gore would have apologized to them. Liberals seem to be anti war whenever the republicans are in power, yet don't seem to shy away from war when they are in power. Gore probably would have fought the war on terror if for no other reason than because it would help him politically. I think Gore would have used the WOT for political reasons, something Bush hasn't done. The only reason democrats are trying to stop the war on terror is because Bush is in power. Plain and simple they would accept a loss on the war on terror if it means them gaining power. This isn't a complement for Gore, just stating the facts as I see them.

I agree 100% about Kerry.
153 posted on 04/03/2006 8:21:11 PM PDT by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: RHINO369
Gore would have done NOTHING of the kind!

When the terrorists tried to blow up the WTC, with truck bombs, in '93, Clinton IGNORED it and later said that it was a NEW YORK CITY POLICE MATTER.

162 posted on 04/03/2006 9:36:37 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson