Irrelevant. The job of the defense is to stall that, and they have their methods. If a defense atty. REALLY had some evidence, McVeigh would have gotten a mistrial at best, plead to a lesser offense at worst. CERTAINLY this is true for Nichols.
McVeigh's lawyers said that was not the point.
They contended McVeigh was cheated by the FBI. That it did not play by the rules. That, if given more time, they might be able to prove a fraud upon the court. If successful, they might be able to persuade a jury to overturn McVeigh's death sentence.
It was not to be. The legal arguments, in a flurry of briefs and oral arguments, ultimately fell on deaf ears.
In the end, with McVeigh's attorneys willing to fight on, McVeigh pulled the plug.