To: P-40
I don't see how? How was it in, say, Nichols' defense atty. (who would have a multi-million book deal) "best interest" to keep such a thing a secret? Or how is it in someone in the prosecutors' office---where certainly, if this is 'real," would have had dissenters? They would stand to make a fortune. Quite the contrary, it is in EVERYONE'S best interest---McV, N, the attorneys, the prosecutors---to have the whole "expose" come out.
117 posted on
04/03/2006 10:30:54 AM PDT by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news)
To: LS
McV, N, the attorneys, the prosecutors---to have the whole "expose" come out.
It would not be in the best interests of the government...and they held all the relevant cards. It always sounded like the defense was kept from the tools it needed to do its job and the prosecution was given just enough tools to do theirs.
130 posted on
04/03/2006 10:38:32 AM PDT by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson