Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-40

I don't see how? How was it in, say, Nichols' defense atty. (who would have a multi-million book deal) "best interest" to keep such a thing a secret? Or how is it in someone in the prosecutors' office---where certainly, if this is 'real," would have had dissenters? They would stand to make a fortune. Quite the contrary, it is in EVERYONE'S best interest---McV, N, the attorneys, the prosecutors---to have the whole "expose" come out.


117 posted on 04/03/2006 10:30:54 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: LS
McV, N, the attorneys, the prosecutors---to have the whole "expose" come out.

It would not be in the best interests of the government...and they held all the relevant cards. It always sounded like the defense was kept from the tools it needed to do its job and the prosecution was given just enough tools to do theirs.
130 posted on 04/03/2006 10:38:32 AM PDT by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson