[LS]

Agreed, and this speaks more to the seeming fact that, when exposed to cross exam, their assertions would fall apart and be of no value. A good atty. CERTAINLY would have called them . . . if any had anything at all to say that would stand up.

[P-40]

their assertions would fall apart and be of no value.

I don't know. The agent on the clip I posted certainly found one of them credible...but the agent would never be able to say that on the witness stand...because the government took the position that there were no tapes. That claim has since been reversed. And it is not like you could see McVeigh once and then forget him. He stood out, to say the least.