[TexasTransplant]

>>>>"Actually, anyone who can defend our current tax mess is by definition irrational. Catch 22."<<<<

Isn't Sanity the first reason to disqualify you from judging whether or not Catch 22 is legal or not?

Great Movie, I can still see the airplane cutting Garfunkle in half, and that happened what 30 years ago? Must have made an impression, the message was less impressive since I don't remember it. The idea of a catch 22 was just so Anarchic that it still appeals to my "I'm against that" side of me even today, the wild part is what they were against is so different today.
(To those Clowns that want to Cherry pick my posts, this is rich)
TT

[tpaine]

Actually, anyone who can defend our current tax mess is by definition irrational. Catch 22.

Isn't Sanity the first reason to disqualify you from judging whether or not Catch 22 is legal or not?

Some here at FR think it's sane to insist that governments have the power to prohibit liberty, and that anyone who protests this power is crazy, - a belief that 'proves' the governments point.

I hope we both can agree on which belief is actually insane.