Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

He is discussing the methods of nature in reducing large populations not suggesting that there be an extermination by other men.

It is the results of observing biological processes without considering that mankind is more than just a biological process.


62 posted on 04/02/2006 3:57:11 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: All

Isn't this the plot of a Tom Clancy book?


64 posted on 04/02/2006 4:00:33 PM PDT by Coolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: justshutupandtakeit
That could be. But dontcha think that some envirowackos wouldn't be sad if half the human population were gone tomorrow.

At minimum, they'd like the U.S. to revert back to a preindustrial society, with all of us living in teepees without electricity, where the child mortality rate is at 40% and life expectancy of 35 years. Where our impact on the environment is nil and even beneficial since animals could feed on our remains after we die after our miserable lives.
76 posted on 04/02/2006 4:17:27 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: justshutupandtakeit
It is the results of observing biological processes without considering that mankind is more than just a biological process.

What is the basis for the assertion that mankind is more than just a biological process?

Cordially,

129 posted on 04/03/2006 7:51:18 AM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson