Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

Years ago I had a teacher who said the same thing-almost. He opined the population needs to be culled. Disease was almost licked and war did not kill enough people.
At first glance the idea of a mass killing of humans sounds like something a mad scientist would say.
Closer examination tells us exploding populations puts a strain on resources. What is the limit?
Is it more humane to expect a meteorite causing mass extinctions ala, dinosauers?


26 posted on 04/02/2006 3:13:12 PM PDT by Duffboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Duffboy

We move forward with science and technology, or we suffer one of these fates. Funny how every "impending crisis" is staved off. While the little wuss boys weep and say we are doomed, there is another group of people living in reality working to make things better. Scientific progress really confounds the chicken littles.


29 posted on 04/02/2006 3:18:40 PM PDT by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Duffboy
At first glance the idea of a mass killing of humans sounds like something a mad scientist would say.

Or Pol Pot

33 posted on 04/02/2006 3:22:18 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Duffboy

What color is the sky on your planet?

You put the potential of an astrologic event like a meteor strike in terms of "humaneness"? Gosh, lets all vote on it. I am in favor of a humane meteor strike (LOL). By the way, I am also in favor of the Sun being turned down, it gets really hot in the summer.


55 posted on 04/02/2006 3:51:32 PM PDT by sgtyork (May it ever be so, that our government is not afraid to trust the people with arms)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson