Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HangnJudge

Ebola is 90 per cent lethal in areas where medical services are primitive. Early massive hydration,shock resuscitation and BP pressure support, kidney dialysis support and steroid use would decrease mortality rates considerably...the key, just like in SARS and Bird Flu is to control the immune system to keep it from going into permanent lock-up (which causes the macrophages to literally totally destroy the body while in the process of trying to eliminate the viral invader).

Now one just doesn't find such advanced support in the Congo, or many parts of Asia, or the rainforests of South America!

I understand that those who have survived the disease are permanently immune from it!


58 posted on 04/02/2006 2:56:01 PM PDT by mdmathis6 (Proof against evolution:"Man is the only creature that blushes, or needs to" M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: mdmathis6
By defeating a virus, the survivor has the genetic code to fight it. Sometimes a virus can go dormant and hide (HIV). The virus doesn't always die within the survivor's body. It may stay with him/her for life. It doesn't necessarily mean that the virus can be transmitted either.

Ebola survivors have donated blood to new victims with some measure of success (from what I've heard).

Hoping for an Ebola scurge is not very likely. Bacterial infection is the more likely WMD agent, and plagues generally hurt poorer nations.

Ironically, the diabolic mindset to rid the world of the human race is usually a mind that hates industrialized nations and is enamored with "simple" 3rd world cultures.

From this present uncharitable horror show, I wouldn't be suprised if this results oriented malicious-minded "doctor" ultimately targets homosexuals instead of industrialists captialists just to have some measure of success. After all, who was the Nazi that stated, "At least we killed 6 million Jews"? Might the diabolic "doctor" say in similar fashion, "at least we killed the homo's."

The crowd that enjoys sexual perversion as a entertainment or a lifestyle should be especially leary of Ebola murderers. Condoms aren't armor enough and neither are latex underwear. Death by any virus is horrifically painful. I doubt bacterial infection is any cozier.

Toning down the virus to stretch its incubation period while making it more survivable in harsher environments will effect those most likely to catch a virus in the first place.

Homosexual activists catching the virus puts society at greater risk considering the past behavior of their most extreme elements. Spreading disease has been on Act-Up's agenda as part of their pursuit of power plan.

Note to the left of center crowd: killing off homosexuals will not make the Democratic party appear more moderate. Everyone, not just unborn children, has a right to life (including sinners struggling with lust and same sex attraction). Using or appealing to the worst of human haters to rid your party's sexually perverted elements will not help you politically nor will it ensure a stable future.

Historical example:



Ernst Röhm

Memorable History is not that old.
74 posted on 04/02/2006 4:19:32 PM PDT by SaltyJoe (A mother's sorrowful heart and personal sacrifice redeems her lost child's soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson