If this really is "damned serious stuff" then why don't you try to accurately explain how the CFR is a "threat" instead of spamming so many threads with your bogus claims of conspiracy. For example, why don't you explain, (or do you even know) that the CFR does not take a policy stance on any issue. In fact, if you actually read the document you keep spamming, you will read on the first page of the report the following statement...(Caps are from the source)
THE COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S.GOVERNMENT. ALL STATEMENTS OF FACT AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION CONTAINED IN ITS PUBLICATIONS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR OR AUTHORS."
So why can't you present the facts as they really are Travis? Why do you have to pretend there is something sinister or secret about the CFR? Why are you trying to use an independent council with members as diverse as William F. Buckley to William J. Clinton as a bludgeon against Tony Snow? Why do you think the nearly 4500 members of CFR speak with one voice?
If this really were as "serious" as you want to believe, you would stick to the facts. Instead, you weaken your own cause by trumpeting unsupported hysteria about "power games" and "holy water to the devil". You've fallen off the edge of rationality. Very sad.
"Building a North American Community," the official agenda of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Bite me. You might as well post some boiler plate from CAIR saying Islam is a religion of peace, with no intention of conducting jihad.
So it's hardly a "conspiracy." The CFR lays it right out in the open, Rocky.