Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Plutarch
We've been thru this so many times.

You want to use the "snapshot" method of measuring but economists use the thru-time method. The Thru-time method is the method that the US has always used with immigrants.

27 posted on 04/02/2006 10:36:26 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Ben Ficklin
(1) The $89,000 figure is not a "snapshot". It is the net present value of the immigrant in his lifetime. It is also the figure used by the Academy that you say we must not impugn. It was also the definition used by Gillespie in his piece. You cannot dismiss it or pretend to be confused by it.

(2) Please answer my question as to why we should favor poorly educated illegals, who are so costly for the taxpayer, when we might substitute better educated legal immigrants who will benefit the taxpayer (according to the not-to- be- impugned NRS study)? This is true whether we look at a single generation or several.

28 posted on 04/02/2006 10:51:01 AM PDT by Plutarch (Hint: Cheap labor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson