Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NapkinUser; stopem
The Wall Street Journal is nothing short of a shill for cheap labor and open borders.

The WSJ doesn't have a bunch of dummies working for it. These people know what they're talking about. And as far as "shills" go, the bio on the guy who wrote the piece shows he has Republican credentials; after all, he was the RNC Chairman for a year and a half.

But don't just take Gillespie's word on the matter and dismiss it. Read Julian Simon's research on the The Economic Consequences of Immigration into the United States. Informed people should know not to bet against the late Julian Simon.

18 posted on 04/02/2006 5:49:11 AM PDT by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: LowCountryJoe

"And as far as "shills" go, the bio on the guy who wrote the piece shows he has Republican credentials; after all, he was the RNC Chairman for a year and a half."

I know exactly who he is. Gillespie supports the McCain-Kennedy-Specter immigration bill, which in my opinion is the worst, most liberal immigration bill floating through the senate.


19 posted on 04/02/2006 5:57:38 AM PDT by NapkinUser (Secure our borders, no amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: LowCountryJoe

Their bottom line is THEIR bottom line.

I view it from MY bottom line which is as a taxpayer and American worker who does not support lowering wages, who sees the result of having to pick up the tab to support them (on medicaid, welfare, overcrowded schools)and subsidize their employers.


20 posted on 04/02/2006 5:58:20 AM PDT by stopem (Call any co you deal with and insist they not let any illegal work on or near your property, we did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: LowCountryJoe
From Julian Simon’s research:

It doesn't matter what Julian Simon's research shows, because Gillespie didn't cite it. He chose to cite the NRS study and he did in error to his favor, for which he needs to be brought to account.

The WSJ doesn't have a bunch of dummies working for it. These people know what they're talking about. And as far as "shills" go...

A shill is not a dummie, a shill is a cunning person operating a deceitful enterprise. This describes the WSJ on the immigration issue to to tee.

shill   Audio pronunciation of "shill" ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (shl) Slang
n.
One who poses as a satisfied customer or an enthusiastic gambler to dupe bystanders into participating in a swindle.

v. shilled, shill·ing, shills
v. intr.
To act as a shill.

v. tr.
  1. To act as a shill for (a deceitful enterprise).
  2. To lure (a person) into a swindle.


[Perhaps short for shillaber.]

shill

n : a decoy who acts as an enthusiastic customer in order to stimulate the participation of others v : act as a shill; "The shill bid for the expensive carpet during the auction in order to drive the price up"

Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University

[Gillespie] has Republican credentials; after all, he was the RNC Chairman for a year and a half.

Believing that the shill has credibility because of his Republican credentials on this particular issue makes you the dupe.

24 posted on 04/02/2006 8:57:30 AM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson