[longshadow]

And besides the speaker himself, all of we have is an opinion from an anonymous post on the internet.

You must have "mispoken" when you said "anonymous": the source is clearly identified in my post.

Her professional information is also available online by following the source of the quote in my #201, i.e., the link in #190, and then double-click on her name: it includes, but is not limited to, her e-mail address, research interests, and CV.

For someone who professes to be interested in the facts, you don't seem to be making much effort. Three or four mouse clicks isn't too much strain, is it?

This concludes our dialogue.

[AmishDude]

Posting on a blog does not constitute public remarks. Sorry.

[Doctor Stochastic]

Facts ceased being important to self-styled "Conservatives" some time ago. The Conservative response to Mims babbling is identical to their behavior in the early days of the "runaway bride" case.

[AmishDude]

OK. I was supposed to go to a post (that you didn't link to) then click on that and then scroll down through to find what you did (I couldn't find it, BTW, I think there's a mechanism that shortens the posts) then stalk around to find out who this woman was?

Frankly, it's a little creepy and my main point (I love your propensity for tangents) is that she doesn't add any new information.

[Right Wing Professor]

So now, the Seguin Gazette Enterprise, the newspaper that broke the entire Pianka 'story', has pulled everything - the original story, the transcripts, etc., from their website.

Memory hole, anyone?