Skip to comments.
The Islamist Challenge to the U.S. Constitution
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/010847.php#comments ^
Posted on 04/01/2006 3:19:20 PM PST by rajuchor
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Be Prepared, very prepared....May be we may have to fight Jihadists right here in our own backyard very soon!
1
posted on
04/01/2006 3:19:22 PM PST
by
rajuchor
To: rajuchor
If the Islamicists are allowed to have their own law, then I think we all should be able to have our own law.
2
posted on
04/01/2006 3:23:46 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: rajuchor
The Prime Minister of Australia spoke very bluntly and eloquently on this subject of Islamists and Sharia law. He said witn no bones about it , that while in Australia they would obey Australian law and if they wished to live under Sharia law they should leave Australia and Get the
f--- back where they came from. My sentiments exactly.
To: Brilliant
If the Islamicists are allowed to have their own law, then I think we all should be able to have our own law.That strikes right to the root of issue.
4
posted on
04/01/2006 3:29:44 PM PST
by
sourcery
(Either the Constitution trumps stare decisis, or else the Constitution is a dead letter.)
To: sgtbono2002
Wait, wait...our President says that it is the "Religion of Peace", we need to let more of them in, hence the open border policy. Perhaps we can learn to be more peacefull through a more proper understanding of their laws.
5
posted on
04/01/2006 3:31:35 PM PST
by
sangoo
To: rajuchor
6
posted on
04/01/2006 3:33:52 PM PST
by
VOA
To: rajuchor
I'm sure there's plenty of room for a bit o' Sharia in our "living Constitution."
7
posted on
04/01/2006 3:38:18 PM PST
by
Caveman Lawyer
(Cluckin' defiance)
To: rajuchor
There's no 'may have to' about it. We will have to fight them. It's only a matter of time.
8
posted on
04/01/2006 3:39:49 PM PST
by
CrawDaddyCA
(Your Lord and Master...Foamy the Squirrel)
To: rajuchor
9
posted on
04/01/2006 3:42:46 PM PST
by
PeterFinn
(Anita Bryant was right!)
To: sgtbono2002
Would that our Pres would speak so. Aside from Tancredo, I see few of them with nutsacks betwisk their thighs
10
posted on
04/01/2006 3:44:38 PM PST
by
attiladhun2
(evolution has both deified and degraded humanity)
To: attiladhun2
Thats an observation I have commented on many times.
There isnt a testicle in the whole 100 of them.
To: rajuchor
The Islamic Center for Human Excellence authorization to build an internal Islamic enclave to include a mosque, a school, and twenty-two homes.[
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
One of the inflammatory arguments against vouchers is that they may be used to fund madrasses.
Yes that is true, but vouchers could also be used to send our children to schools that will teach the truth about Islam and fortify them with education they need to defend our Constitution and freedom. Children are surely not getting this in our current government schools.
12
posted on
04/01/2006 4:08:14 PM PST
by
wintertime
(Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
To: Brilliant
The question raised to me by this article is how would a Muslim enclave be different from any other religious community? For example let us use the Amish: are they at all exempt from American law? Or, rather, do any laws that they hold trump those set forth by our government and more importantly our constitution? Being somewhat familiar with the Amish, I would say no. The extra laws they live in their own life are in tandem with American law, but if anyone can shed some light on this I think it would be a good precedence to work with when considering extending such liberties to Muslims.
13
posted on
04/01/2006 4:20:26 PM PST
by
SouthJrzReaganite18
(Freedom is the right of all sentient beings. -Optimus Prime)
To: SouthJrzReaganite18
If that's what the Islamicists were trying to do, they would not need to have the law changed to allow them to do it. They'd just do what the Amish do. They'd just go ahead and do it.
To: SouthJrzReaganite18
"For example let us use the Amish: are they at all exempt from American law?"
No, they are not.
To: SouthJrzReaganite18
The Amish are not exempt from American law. They are allowed to have their own rules for their own people like not using electricity in their homes or having a phone in the house or not driving a car. They have a certain type of clothing that they wear and the women wear bonnets. But if someone violates those rules they have no right to punish someone outside of the laws of the country.
16
posted on
04/01/2006 4:44:14 PM PST
by
SHOOT THE MOON bat
(Blessed are the peacemakers (the US Military) for they shall be called the children of God.)
To: Brilliant
If that's what the Islamicists were trying to do, they would not need to have the law changed to allow them to do it. They'd just do what the Amish do. They'd just go ahead and do it.
You are right. I really don't understand who they are petitioning and what they are petitioning for. If they all want to live among each other and follow their religious rules who is stopping them. That is being done all over this country.
17
posted on
04/01/2006 4:56:07 PM PST
by
SHOOT THE MOON bat
(Blessed are the peacemakers (the US Military) for they shall be called the children of God.)
To: rajuchor
![](http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2005/04/25/image690803x.jpg)
Working Americans buy cheap goods from Chinese slaves.
Working Americans buy cheap services from illegal aliens.
Working Americans buy increasingly expensive oil from rich Islamic Arabs.
So far the working American has not felt the pain of lost manufacturing, a diminishing freedom to hold traditional values, and the loss of freedom to believe as they wish.
With elite Americans selling themselves to oil rich Arabs, working Americans will one day wake up and find everything stolen.
The elite are hard at work building a homeland security apparatus to hold back the angry working American, maybe.
Maybe the elite are underestimating the wrath that will come.
To: SHOOT THE MOON bat
In this case, the answer is that their "religious rules" are unconstitutional. They want to have forced female circumcision. Divorce by Islamic law. They want to hold their women in slavery.
To: rajuchor
Well, my two Federal Senators, my Federal Representative, and my State Senator and Representative have just had that entire article emailed to them.
WE have to be sure that our State and Federal Legislators do not stick their heads in the sand and ignore this very real threat.
It's NOT intolerant to protect our way of life. It's NOT intolerant to tell other people that they're out of step with the American Way of Life.
Come to the USA, then assimilate. WE have freedom of religion. EVERYONE who lives here has the RIGHT to change religions or to have no religion. WE live in the 21st Century and Islam can get with the program or go back to the Middle East.
Nuff Said?
20
posted on
04/01/2006 5:22:13 PM PST
by
HighlyOpinionated
(In Memory of Crockett Nicolas, hit and run in the prime of his Cocker Spaniel life, 9/3/05.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson