To: neverdem
Don't you think the CDC should be involved here. Who is to say this isn't a bioweapon at ground zero?
4 posted on
04/01/2006 1:08:08 AM PST by
Pro-Bush
(A nation without borders is not a nation." --President Reagan)
To: Pro-Bush
Don't you think the CDC should be involved here.I would be surprised if they are not.
6 posted on
04/01/2006 1:21:43 AM PST by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: Pro-Bush
"Don't you think the CDC should be involved here. Who is to say this isn't a bioweapon at ground zero?"
During the Clinton years CDC was in the news constantly, solving problems here and there, they even figured out guns were a disease problem.
I haven't heard from them much during the Bush years, I hope they went back to solving problems with diseases and such.
7 posted on
04/01/2006 1:24:04 AM PST by
ansel12
To: Pro-Bush
Mumps would be a rather pointless and somewhat idiotic bioweapons agent. It certainly would not be worth the risk and expense to develop and deliver.
8 posted on
04/01/2006 1:30:14 AM PST by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: LucyT
32 posted on
04/01/2006 7:05:19 PM PST by
Born Conservative
(Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
To: Pro-Bush
Don't you think the CDC should be involved here. Who is to say this isn't a bioweapon at ground zero? Or more likely someone doing research on bio-spread. Here's hoping it's our guys...
39 posted on
04/01/2006 8:46:54 PM PST by
GOPJ
(Peace happens when evil is vanquished -- Cal Thomas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson