I agree 100 percent; I don't care what the charge is, I don't think it's fair for her name NOT to be given; if she's going to make the charges, she should be named.
Because she's not named, she can pretty well say anything she wants without fear of being contradicted.
After reading that article about the newspaper staff at NCCU, I am sure there is MORE stuff out there that is going to possibly help straighten out what happened that night, but they are covering up for her.
Keep in mind that only the general public doesn't know her name; the suspects all know her name and can and are investigating her background. There is no reason for you and I to know who she is, and really there is no reason for the public to know who the accused are either. I would support a media policy shielding all names involved in a sexual assault claim from being disclosed by the media, at least until actual charges are filed.