What about the reports of her injuries in the hospital and the rape kit? Are we to discount all of that as well when we don't even know the whole story?
What evidence from the rape kit? Once again, having sperm inside you or on your person is not conclusive proof of rape.
What about her father's testimony. He says he saw her the day after the supposed incident and she appeared normal to him. Now, if she'd been beaten, kicked, raped and strangled as she claims, he would have seen it don't you think?
Also, we have another problem here. She claim her father came to the hospital to visit her and that is where he found out about the rape. He says the exact opposit. No hospital visit, she looked fine the next day when he did see her, and he didn't know about the rape until it was reported in the media.
What do you make of that?