Posted on 03/31/2006 8:03:52 PM PST by Howlin
Several of your posts denigrate the accuser, her past and most of your posts purport the statements made by the player's lawyers. It seems you have an agenda and are trying single-handledly to change what you see as "formed" opinions.
The public doesn't have information to know the facts of this event. That is what we have to wait for in order to reach an informed conclusion. Your claim that the local stations covering it constantly, has no relevance as to whether the lacrosse players have fully cooperated. Lawyers proclaiming two players offered to take lie detector tests are meaningless. That is the lawyers job; keep putting out statements favorable to their clients and cast doubt on the accuser. There are 30-40 people that could provide a meaningful picture to the university, the community and the investigators providing what each attendee can add to put together a full and complete account of that night.
Most here are responding to facts or assertions as they become available in order to play detective and solve the mystery of who is lying. We could sit and wait to discuss the case until after the verdict, if any, but why should we?
From the New York Times: "Lawyers for Lacrosse Players Dispute Accusations"
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/31/sports/31duke.html?ex=1301461200&en=c5cefeb061042acd&ei=5089&partner=rssyahoo&emc=rss
Kerry Sutton, who is representing Matt Zash, who lived in the house, said her client was one of the three captains who gave police a lengthy interview and written statement and offered to take a polygraph test.
* * *
Another lawyer, Jim Thomas, who represents a captain who provided the police with statements, said no team member was alone with the accuser. Thomas would not say which player he represented.
* * *
Thomas said: "Everyone asks why these young men have not come forward. It's because no one was in the bathroom with the complainant. No one was alone with her. This didn't happen. They have no information to come forward with."
Butch Williams, who is representing Daniel Flannery, the third resident of the house, said the circumstances surrounding the 911 call that came at 12:53 a.m. March 14 did not ring true. The female caller told the 911 operator that she was passing the house where the party was going on and was cursed by at least one man standing in front of it.
* * *
Zash, Flannery and the other captains David Evans and Bret Thompson issued a statement Tuesday saying that the DNA results would prove the allegations false.
So according to the New York Times (yes, I realize it's the New York Times), we have four captains Matt, Dan, David and Bret. According to this article, Matt and Dan lived in the house. I recall seeing somewhere it disclosed that Bret was the other resident of the house, but I can't lay my fingers on that source at the moment.
And Dan went by the alias "Adam" when dealing with the escort service.
The stripper claimed that Matt, Bret and Adam were the ones who pulled her into the bathroom.
So it would appear captains Matt, Bret and Adam/Dan are likely the ones most in the crosshairs of the accusation. However, you are correct that it is possible that another Matt was the Matt referred to, or even that the players at the party (who had been drinking) all consistently used false names when referring to one another in front of the strippers, and that it was another three partygoers using the names Matt, Bret and Adam who were the ones claimed by the stripper as pulling her into the bathroom.
Okay. So you would say something good about someone that steals the car of her customer and goes on a high-speed chase through 2 counties, and then tries to run over a cop. Not to mention her DWI.
Do you NOT believe that story? Or are you saying SHE should not be judged on her criminal past, yet the players should BE
judged by off-campus open-container and underage drinking violations ?
I think ANY reasonable person when faced with the FACTS that there has been one sided reporting absent ANY charges. Even tonight, the stories coming out are about the same underage drinking violations and the e-mail sent by the 19 year old.
You'd think some stories relating to the Accuser's record would be printed tonight (since the story came out today), however, the stories are easily 100 to 1.
.
Her name is crytal gail mangum.
Your account is new (April 7th) and you have a mission, OakOak. You are the one that is one-sided, unfair and judgemental. A review of your posts reveals how unbecoming your efforts are and how they reflect on you. You are misusing Free Republic for ill purposes.
Prince Harry spotted at strip club
From correspondents in London
April 08, 2006
BRITAIN'S Prince Harry visited a strip club with some friends to celebrate the end of his army officer training course, British tabloids have reported.
The third in line to the throne turned down a lap dance with one of the scantily clad girls at the Spearmint Rhino Club, west of London, saying "No thanks, I've got a girlfriend," the Daily Mirror said.
But the dancer, named in the newspaper as Mariella Butkute from Lithuania, said Harry, 21, did let her sit on his lap for a 10-minute chat.
The prince and his friends went to the club in Colnbrook in the early hours of Friday morning, according to the tabloids.
The young prince is due to take part in a passing out parade at Britain's elite Sandhurst military college next week in front of his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II.
http://www.dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story/0,20281,18749979-5001028,00.html
The ULTIMATE "Privileged Rich White Male" with a stripper!
ROFL!
Harry undoubtedly timed this event carefully in order to express solidarity with his privileged rich white male brethren on the Duke lacrosse team across the pond.
That's your opinion. I'm laying out what happened or in some cases what I think happened (as say when I doing it) .. There are sources.
If you want to believe a ex-con car-jacker/stripper - by all means - feel free.
I live close by and I know more about this case than you do.
Because CNN ran stories saying the white males are out of control and you've heard it enough - you believe it. IF have reasons why I'm post them. FIGHT FACTS with FACTS.
.
I'm a Duke graduate, and I have been reading this thread for the past few days. You guys have been doing a great job staying on top of this and exposing the inconsistencies in the alleged victim's story.
I Googled "Crystal Mangum" and what I found was hilarious. Her personal homepage on xanga.com. I had to register just to share this with all of you.
http://www.xanga.com/I_Love_YoOh_06
This quote says it all:
"TAKE A HOE!!... sorry sorry sorry... " hey.. yall wanna come eat lunch w/ me and my friend" YEA IF YOULL GIVE US A DOLLAR FOR ICE CREAM!."
I'm not drawing final conclusions about what happened one way or another, but I do resent the way the MSM is taking the word of one stripper who has a serious criminal record at face value over the word of 46 young honor students.
I read on an NAACP site that she's studying to be an attorney. With her criminal past, how could she possibly pass the fitness test? Or do they not have the fitness test in NC?
She is studying police psychology.
I think the correct name is Crystal Magnum. The girl on the web page you posted says she went to the "tanning bed"
The correct name is crystal gail Mangum, DOB July 16, 1978.
I don't really know either way for sure. I just think it's odd the girl from the referenced web page is using a tanning bed. Could you reference your source?
Actually, a friend of mine managed a tanning salon and had black dancers tanning all the time. The reasoning behind it, if I recall, is that they want a tan line. Go figure.
NC police records.
I found some other "discrepancies" or untruths on the website that I was reading. Hmm, police psychology. Interesting.
Mmmm. Interesting. I guess tan lines are kinda hot in a way.
Could you reference the web page. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.