Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intel Ops Becoming More Joint, Responsive to Warfighter Needs
Dept Of Def ^ | 3-31-06 | Donna Miles

Posted on 03/31/2006 11:51:47 AM PST by SevenMinusOne

Intel Ops Becoming More Joint, Responsive to Warfighter Needs By Donna Miles American Forces Press Service

NORFOLK, Va., March 31, 2006 – The need to get more intelligence to warfighters faster so they can act on it is fueling big changes in how information is gathered, processed and shared, a U.S. Joint Forces Command official said. There's an increasing appreciation that the global war on terror is an intelligence war, Christopher Jackson, chief of JFCOM's Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Transformation Division, told American Forces Press Service. With that appreciation comes a recognition that information has to be made available more quickly and to more people.

"I think there's a clearer understanding that, in some ways, intelligence delayed is intelligence denied," Jackson said.

Gone are the days when the United States faced a predictable adversary. "Back in the era when we were dealing with the Soviets, we had a lot greater understanding of how they were going to move and when they were going to move and the conditions," Jackson said.

Terrorists, on the other hand, have no rules of engagement or doctrine that guide how they operate. They're highly adaptable and quickly change their tactics. "So we have to try to adapt to and get in front of the situation," Jackson said. One way to do that is with intelligence.

Traditionally, the intelligence community operated as a series of independent "stovepipe" systems, all collecting and processing intelligence, but highly compartmentalized and protective of who had access to it. Often, the more pressing concern was protecting how the intelligence was acquired in the first place.

But that's all changed. "There is still a requirement to be protective of sources and methods, but we are trying to move the pendulum over closer to the side where, as information is collected, it's available across the coalition battle space to all consumers, all people who have a need," Jackson said.

There's also a trend toward making more raw data available to users in the interest of time rather than waiting until it can be fully processed. For example, an operational commander often can look at full-motion video without having to have someone tell him what he's looking at, Jackson said. And the benefit of getting it in real time sometimes outweighs the value of having it processed.

The need to get more intelligence more quickly to more warfighters is driving another shift in long-standing intelligence practices and making them more joint, Jackson said. No longer, for example, are Army sensors devoted solely to gathering intelligence for Army units or Navy intelligence analysts processing intelligence only for fleet operations.

"That's like going into a fight with one arm already tied behind your back, and we're getting away from that," Jackson said. "No single intelligence discipline or source has all the answers. It has to be brought together with as many sources and capabilities as possible."

Working collaboratively makes the best use of "high-demand, low-density" intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets that are always stretched and the need for their services, he said.

This joint focus is enhancing the intelligence warfighters ultimately receive. "For example, the fact that you can put Navy personnel in an Air Force facility, exploiting information coming from Army sensors, you get a little bit more information than you would otherwise get if it was just the Navy talking to the Navy talking to the Navy, or the Army talking to the Army talking to the Army," Jackson said.

He said he sees no end in the growing demand for intelligence to support warfighters. He sees a day when every soldier, sailor, airmen and Marine serves as a sensor, reporting observations into a local information grid that becomes part of a broad intelligence matrix.

"The idea is that you get all these different data sources put into a local information grid so that you are a subscriber to the grid. You can call down the information for whatever you need, when you need it," Jackson said.

In that vision, subscribers to that grid -- warfighters whose mission and lives often depend on solid intelligence -- will be able to access that information from their computer screens with an easy-to-use search engine. "It's like applying Google to intelligence data," Jackson said. "You'll be able to bring disparate sources in from all sorts of different places and lay one on top of the other and you have a lot better chance to getting more pieces of the puzzle."


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: intel; wot
KISS - Always works best - Getting Intel to our warfighters / shooters as quickly as possible is only going to shorten our OODA loop and make more bad guys dead - Which is exactly what we want -

SecDef Rumsfeld has been great at pushing this type thinking through our military - He has done a great deal at finding ways to make our SOF less dependent on "others" (OGAs, CIA, ect) for all their Intel needs.

Implementing this philosophy throughout the military is exactly what is needed.

1 posted on 03/31/2006 11:51:49 AM PST by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DevSix

I always suspected you were an intel weenie. ;-)


2 posted on 03/31/2006 11:56:19 AM PST by Coop (Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

"There's an increasing appreciation that the global war on terror is an intelligence war..."

At least a decade ago, this would have walked away with the "DUH! Award". Our lack of intelligence regarding terrorists, over the years, has bordered on the criminal. But still, better late than never.


3 posted on 03/31/2006 12:06:58 PM PST by David Isaac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

LOL!


4 posted on 03/31/2006 12:17:21 PM PST by Dog (We have had a date with destiny and Iran for 27 years---appealof2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Just so there's no misunderstanding, I am what I accuse him of being. :-)


5 posted on 03/31/2006 12:18:22 PM PST by Coop (Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson