B. There's a reason that laws exist. It's kinda like pebbles in a pond. Tossing a pebble might mean nothing, but then there are those pesky ripples. To promote a "hump at will" society in front of our children, to allow it, undermines the family unit. And I have never, ever, ever seen a SUCCESSFUL polyamorous couple. There may be some. BUT The % of failure is way way high. Higher than marriage between consenting male/female. High like gay marriage. This affects the kids as well when the marriages of their parents falls apart. There is no permanence or security in their family home.
3.Further, there WILL be a favorite. Three's a crowd. This makes it demeaning to women.
How about we return to RESPECTING the institution... It's not about I get his house when he dies. It's about loving another person enough to want to be with no one else, perhaps have children together, raise them well and grow old together. One on one. Not one on fifteen.
Sometimes I think this is solely about men's egos. Newsflash.... ain't none of you so good or such an inspired/eager/ever-ready lover that we NEED to share you in order to accommodate you. Have I been with every one? No. Have I been with a good healthy representative sample? You bet. Use to dance at girly bars, had 36 Cs at age 12. And I ain't never met a man worth sharing with no other woman.
How's that?
Bravo....I think I'm in love....and I'm a woman! ; )
Be careful, before you know it you'll be labled a screeching, disturbed individual.
Let me guess, you've burned a bra or two in your life?
1. Sorry, not an atheist, but nice guess.
2. You nor anyone else has proof that if this were legalized it would be worse for the children. So please try this one on someone else, I ain't buying.
3. Sounds like you are affraid you would be the one that was not the favorite, again, no proof only speculation.
As far as the sharing comment, nobody is saying that you have to be part of a plural marriage but for those who do have interest, you have no buisness dictating your choice on them...la