Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tarkin

Sandra Day O'Connor reversed herself with the odious Lawrence v. Texas decision.


3 posted on 03/31/2006 8:34:07 AM PST by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sittnick

No she actually didn't. She didn't join the opinion of the Court in Lawrence and didn't vote to overrule Bowers.:

"The Court today overrules Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986). I joined Bowers, and do not join the Court in overruling it." (LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 539 U.S. 558, O’Connor, J., concurring in judgment)

She joined the judgment of the Court because she concluded that (unlike the Georgia statute challenged in Bowers) the Texas statute violated the equal protection clause.


4 posted on 03/31/2006 8:39:47 AM PST by Tarkin (Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: sittnick

We are all much better off now that Sandy O'Connor is gone from the Court. You never knew WHAT she would do as the swing vote. A lot of it depended on her mood.


5 posted on 03/31/2006 8:40:29 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson