Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BunnySlippers

It was 6.7, but it was shallow, which made it very destructive. I lived through the 6.8 here in Seattle five years ago. That one was deep, so it did much less damage.


22 posted on 03/30/2006 10:05:05 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Publius

Funny as the Whittier quake extracted more damage on my house than Northridge. Although Northridge was a wild ride.


24 posted on 03/30/2006 10:08:31 PM PST by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Publius

It was much shallower than the Nisqually quake but not REALLY shallow; it was still fairly far underground on a blind thrust.

Also, most of the energy of Northridge was actually directed into fairly uninhabited mountains.

It could have been much, much worse...in timing as well.


26 posted on 03/30/2006 10:09:29 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson