Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Appeals court says governor's committee violated disclosure law
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 3/30/06 | Steve Lawrence - ap

Posted on 03/30/2006 6:30:04 PM PST by NormsRevenge

A state appeals court says a campaign committee controlled by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger broke state law by not promptly reporting millions of dollars in expenditures promoting four measures on last November's special election ballot.

The 3rd District Court of Appeal, in a decision issued Wednesday, said Schwarzenegger's California Recovery Team should have reported the expenditures within 24 hours after they were made during the 90 days leading up to the Nov. 8 election but failed to do so.

"CRT ignores that the (Political Reform Act) requires reporting of independent expenditures on a 24-hour basis during an election cycle," a three judge panel said. "CRT is not free to determine when and what information to discuss; it must comply with the (act)."

The court said attorneys for the California Recovery Team and Schwarzenegger acknowledged that the spending met the "statutory definition" of independent expenditures but that somehow they were not.

"They offer no argument or authority why the expenditures are not independent expenditures, other than the naked declaration that they are not...," the court said. "Unfortunately, ... the law says otherwise."

Independent expenditures are campaign expenditures made without coordination with a candidate or a ballot measure committee.

Thomas Hiltachk, the treasurer and attorney for the California Recovery Team, said the committee "accepted the court's decision" but stressed that all the expenditures at issue were reported before the election.

"It's really a question of what form should we have filed them on," he said.

Alliance for a Better California, a campaign committee that opposed the Schwarzenegger ballot measures, said the California Recovery Team voluntarily filed more than 160 campaign spending reports covering more than $25 million in expenditures a few days before the election.

But those reports were "well beyond the 24-hour reporting deadlines," said Joe Nunez, the alliance's chairman.

He filed a complaint Thursday with the state Fair Political Practices Commission, citing the appeals court decision and urging the agency to fine the Schwarzenegger committee.

A spokesman for the FPPC, Jon Matthews, said he could not comment on the complaint except to say that the commission's chairwoman, Liane Randolph, had sent a letter to the court last year "supporting the interpretation of the Political Reform Act that the court eventually followed."

Schwarzenegger's campaign opponents brought the case to the appeals court after a Sacramento County Superior Court judge concluded that the law was "less than clear" on what the California Recovery Team's reporting requirements were.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: appealscourt; arnolddonors; california; committee; disclosurelaw; fppc; governors; joenunez; violated

1 posted on 03/30/2006 6:30:07 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Alliance for a Better California, a campaign committee that opposed the Schwarzenegger ballot measures, said the California Recovery Team voluntarily filed more than 160 campaign spending reports covering more than $25 million in expenditures a few days before the election.

But those reports were "well beyond the 24-hour reporting deadlines," said Joe Nunez, the alliance's chairman.

---

Irony or what? Is this the same Joe Nunez that the Gubby just re-appointed to the state Board of education? lolol

CA: Governor reappoints union official to state ed board (Joe Nunez)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1606447/posts


2 posted on 03/30/2006 6:33:20 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Is this the same Joe Nunez that the Gubby just re-appointed to the state Board of education?

That would be the guy!

Regarding the article, I don't get it. They argue that the California Recovery Team is an Independent Committee but doesn't have Independent Expenditures? And the attorney for the Independent Committee is Arnold's long time attorney? Why am I confused?

3 posted on 03/30/2006 6:40:32 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Of course the courts say that. What do you expect liberal politically motivated judges to say?


4 posted on 03/30/2006 6:59:18 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Irony or what? Is this the same Joe Nunez that the Gubby just re-appointed to the state Board of education?

Apparently, Nunez rushed from the confirmation ceremony at the Hyatt on Wednesday, to the FFP's office this morning, to file a complaint against his boss suggesting fines should be imposed.

Seems an ungrateful little twit who serves at the pleasure of an Austrian, village idiot.

5 posted on 03/30/2006 7:00:57 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
I don't get it.

I do.

This little misadventure of the ungreatful twit and his sponsor, the village idiot, should stand as a stark reminder of the new flavor of political inbreeding that the Wilsonegger gang has introduced into Sacramento.

Next we'll discover that Joe is Fabian's cousin, twice removed.

6 posted on 03/30/2006 7:10:28 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Hey Arnie, you hold a snake by the tail it will end up biting you.


7 posted on 03/30/2006 7:27:01 PM PST by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Has Arnoid been kidnapped and a clone put in his place. No one can be this dumb without help!


8 posted on 03/30/2006 7:31:16 PM PST by tubebender (BIG REWARD for my missing tag line. Please advance a security deposit to enter...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
You already know what I think of this lamebrane celebrity tryna play the role of Governor with a really chitty bang bang scriptwriter!!!

Let me take this opportunity to tell everybody once again! Arnold's only concern is that he be adored and loved by every possible human being that he encounters and that the rest go see his movies, or cast a vote for him when he decides to play to the voting audience!!!

He's not going to be satisfied by the ever so slight rise in the poll done by the Public Policy Institute and will decided to leave politics on the eve of the election, or some time between now and then... THAT'S HOW DUMB HE IS!!! (the only thing dumber is the CAGOP for prematurely endorsing him before we even have a danged primary!)

CA Republicans are rapidly being made fools of and that "ship of fools" is captained by none other than celebrity fool Arnold Schnortzenegger!!! Anyway, that's my opinion and I'm stickin to it!!!

9 posted on 03/30/2006 8:22:55 PM PST by SierraWasp (Without knowing the force of words, it is impossible to know man!!! (or especially Waspman!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; tubebender; SierraWasp; Amerigomag
I just looked at the filings for the CRT . Here's some statistics:
For the period August 1 2005 through December 31, 2005 (based on transaction date)

Total # of donations over $1,000        1,565
Total $ associated with above     $31,186,173
Avg $/contribution                $    19,927

Average days to file                      108
Fewest days to file                        44
Most days to file                         149


10 posted on 03/30/2006 9:38:04 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
YOWZA!

Weintraub: California Insider (SacBee blog)

The governor and his allies got slammed pretty hard today in a Court of Appeal ruling on their failure to fully report in a timely fashion contributions last fall in the campaigns for Props. 74, 75, 76 and 77. It looks as if the matter will now go to the Fair Political Practices Commission to decide if the campaign should be fined, and, if so, how much.

The case was brought by groups that opposed Schwarzenegger's proposals on the ballot last year. The governor's lawyers claimed that the violations were technical and meaningless. The court forcefully disagreed. And now the Alliance for a Better California, a coalition of labor groups that has opposed Schwarzenegger, is pressing the FPPC to levy up to $25 million in fines for the violations.


11 posted on 03/30/2006 11:11:06 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Well... he... he... hell!!! Talk about yer Justice!!! Now if they'd turn right around and investigate The Alliance For A Better California just as hard... But No... ho... hoooo!!!


12 posted on 03/31/2006 8:55:18 AM PST by SierraWasp (Without knowing the force of words, it is impossible to know man!!! (or especially Waspman!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson